Thursday, 1 November 2012


U.S.A. FLOODS


 Hello, everyone. I'm sorry it's been such a long time since I've been able to blog, but I simply had to respond to the present sight of the hurricane and floods on the American East coast, and especially in New York. This is probably going to be a "one off" blog


At the end of July Billy Graham, now 93, published an open letter to America calling for repentance in the face of threatening judgement. In his letter, “My heart aches for America” Billy Graham said he recalled how his late wife, Ruth, once expressed concerns about the “nation’s terrible downward spiral” – exclaiming, “If God doesn’t punish America, He’ll have to apologise to Sodom and Gomorrah”. He went on to say that he wondered what Ruth would think of the country today where “self-centred indulgence, pride, and lack of shame over sin are now emblems of the American lifestyle”.

Charisma magazine, which widely publicised the letter said, “Graham’s letter calling America to repentance comes as a growing number of respected Christian leaders have issued similar warnings in recent months, noting that the nation is on a downward spiral of economic decline, immorality, corruption, growing secular humanism and attacks on religious liberty”. Jack Hayford says Graham’s letter comes as the nation is in “a very grim hour as we approach the election this year.  We are at the point that desperate action is needed and Billy’s voice can give rise to that”. Rabbi Cahn, the senior pastor at the America’s largest Messianic (Jewish Christian) congregation said in his book, The Harbinger, “The same progression of judgement that occurred in the last days of ancient Israel is now occurring in America. The call is ultimately for salvation for those who don’t know the Lord and repentance and revival for those who do”.

All this caused a stir and produced large prayer gatherings throughout October and which continue. We need to thank God for this.

It is in this context that the flooding of New York and its surrounding states needs to be weighed and taken very seriously to heart. If ever there was to be a divine affirmation of the relevance and accuracy of Billy Graham’s warning, this flooding has to be it. It is a remarkable fact that for several months before and up to the 9/11 disaster, David Wilkerson’s church in Times Square, very close to Ground Zero, was impelled to prayer and fasting sensing that some grave danger threatened the U.S. Billy Graham’s warning seems to have been a similar kind of spiritual forewarning.

We need to be very thankful for such forewarnings and prayer. One feels very much that such prayer must have brought a mitigation of what might have been worse destruction. However, the stark fact remains that such prayer did not prevent the disaster occurring. This is the fact that we have to ponder very seriously: the flood still came.

The present disaster, the flooding in New York and New Jersey in particular, was huge as we have all seen. The storm with its diameter of 1,000 miles was huge, the 13ft surge which swept across Manhattan was unparalleled, and millions were left without water and power. The cost of the damage will be in billions of dollars at a time when the U.S. economy can least afford such draconian demands on its already debt-laden public purse. It is one more disaster in a train of disasters suffered by the U.S. since the turn of the millennium.

It has to come into the category of a “judgement” in its own right, though. like 9/11 it seems very clear that it is also a pointer and a warning against worse that is to come. Billy Graham was right to talk of judgement in the American context. It was another warning, another wake-up call, another call to repentance and a return to God. But will it be seen in that light? That is the critical question. 9/11 certainly wasn’t seen in that light except by very few Christians. The nation didn’t see 9/11 that way, but proudly talked of a rebuild and a crusade against an “axis of evil”. The American church in general didn’t see it that way and preached against such talk of judgement.  What of this latest disaster? I sense that the timing of Billy Graham’s letter was such that there will now be a few more ears open to and ready to accept that the idea of judgement is not one to be trifled with. We should be thankful for that, though many evangelical Christians will still find difficulty in coming to terms with the concept and challenge of a God who brings such judgement.

The secular, “enlightened” world will not see it this way (unless there is a miracle on the scale of Nineveh’s repentance after Jonah’s preaching). Their intent is to get Wall St. (part of the essential problem!) back into operation as quickly as possible and they will take pride in such human restoration. The religious and denominational leaders will be rightly urging help and aid for the victims but none the less will cling to the humanistic concept that to talk of judgement is abhorrent, immoral and non-Christian.

What grounds have we for insisting on such a judgment dimension? There are two; First, biblical, and second, experiential.

The biblical case for understanding God as a God who judges nations is overwhelming. Likewise the biblical case for those judgements taking the shape of war and natural disasters is equally overwhelming. There are 3 Major Prophets (Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel) and there are 12 “minor” prophets. In every single one, judgement and judgement by natural disasters is foundational. This is their fundamental message. Likewise they are foundational doctrines in the historical books, and in books of the Law. Natural disaster as judgement is epitomised in Amos 4 where Amos catalogues the disasters which Israel has suffered over a number of years, disasters which the Israelites chose to ignore. The question is never whether these concepts of judgement are biblical; the question is whether we receive them as the word of God and active for our own generation. The humanistic strain in religion has rejected that possibility (and with vehemence!) and looked for a more up to date ethic. But to a Christian who sees God speaking and enunciating principles in scripture that is not an option; they have to come to terms with what they are reading.

The second reason, experiential, relates to what we can see happening around us in our experience. Briefly, for example, if we put together the moral state of the U.S. as a nation and the severe buffeting that has been happening to it on many fronts in the last ten years then we are forced to see the power of the biblical paradigm of judgement that the prophets give to us: it is there in front of our eyes. God judges nations, even America! Billy Graham is an American, he is not out to “bash” America, but he sees very clearly the utter corruption of corporate America, its appalling sexual license, self-indulgence and pride. As a spiritual man it sickens him and he knows there have to be consequences. He knows, and we know, that these things cannot go on without some divine rebuke. That is the simple truth we have to wake up to.

Postscript. 9/11 brought severe destruction to the Twin Towers which epitomised corporate America, and also some destruction to the Pentagon, the military HQ of the nation. In the ten years that followed both corporate America and the military have taken a severe drubbing and been deeply shaken. The White House, representing the Presidency, was significantly spared in the 9/11 attack. One wonders whether the timing of the flooding just prior to the Presidential election has significance. These judgements are prophetic pointers which it is wise just to keep in mind as we look to the future.

Our prayer must continue to be that of Habakkuk, “Lord, in wrath remember mercy”.


Bob

Tuesday, 15 May 2012

Reluctantly I am needing to take a rest from computer work for week or two. In the meantime every blessing to everyone!

Bob

Tuesday, 8 May 2012

AN OPEN LETTER



Most of you will know that we are in the middle of a national consultation on the way same-sex relationships might be brought into the category of marriage. The consultation finishes in a month’s time and it is critical that the Christian voice is heard on this issue along with all others
who find this disturbing. Three ways of speaking out are to sign the petition organized by C4M, write to your MP, and respond to the questions being asked in the government’s consultation paper. If possible we need to do all three. Already nearly 500,000 people have signed the petition, and there cannot be too many. Government ministers tend to live in denial unless “blown” out it!

I thought it might be of encouragement if I made my own letter to my MP an open letter in this column, and so I do. It has been a difficult to know how to write this letter. I can’t say that I am fully satisfied with it since it is quite impossible to say all that ought to be said or to know how it should be said. My only consolation is that at least I’ve said something, and along with others who might just say something we trust it may have an effect. You might find it helpful; you might want to make a comment on it; you might want to disagree. I simply offer it:-

Dear (MP),

I hope you will not mind me writing to you in connection with the government’s consultation on equal marriage. Though that consultation makes provision for the expression of individual viewpoints, I none the less value the opportunity of writing to you personally as my MP since you would be involved in any consequent legislation in the Commons, and I do not feel satisfied by the unavoidable faceless and impersonal process with which the consultation responses are to be considered.

I simply want to say that I am deeply disturbed by the proposal to redefine marriage to include
same-sex relationships. I believe it to be retrogressive, not progressive, since it will inevitably undermine the most important of our social institutions, the nuclear family of a man and a woman and their children. It will lead to a sea change in terminology and in attitudes which will confuse a new generation and lead them away from that nuclear family, seriously distorting and damaging our society.



I am equally disturbed by the fact that the Minister for Equality, Ms. Lynne Featherstone, should have publically dismissed the sort of viewpoint I have just expressed as being “homophobic”, making the assumption that all right thinking people should see things through her own “liberal progressive” eyes. That clearly betrays intolerance; an intolerance that is also very evident in the curt, draconian manner in which the consultation has proscribed any discussion on whether such change should or should not be made, and confined it to the “how” only. As many have pointed out this is scarcely a democratic way of proceeding since no party manifesto spoke of this. Changes to foundational, time honoured institutions cannot be brought in by the back door.

May I enumerate three further considerations?

1. There is no legal necessity for this proposal; all legal requirements for same-sex relationships are in place in civil partnerships.
2. There is no national mandate for these proposals. Quite the contrary. Numerous social surveys show that when people are aware of what civil partnerships already provide there is a very clear majority desire to retain marriage as it is. It is interesting that all the states of USA which have held a referendum on the issue have rejected same-sex marriage though upholding civil partnerships.
3. The "safeguards” to protect the continuance of heterosexual marriage only in religious organisations look very much to be unfounded reassurances. They are ignoring a statement from the European Court of Human Rights to the effect that if the British law is changed making same-sex marriage legal they will ensure that it also applies to those wishing to be married in churches in this country. All ministers of religion need cast iron assurance that there can be no legal proceeding against them if they decline to marry same sex couples in church. This is a crucial right of conscience, and it will undoubtedly be under threat.

I apologize for the length of this letter but thank you in advance for whatever time you are able to give to it. I know you will have your own personal views n the issue, but have the confidence to believe you will take the viewpoint I have expressed seriously and seek some safeguard.

With continued good wishes to you in all the good work you do for the constituency, which is appreciated by many.

Yours sincerely, etc



May the Lord guide all of us, whether in prayer or
action.

N.B. C4M stands for "Coalition for Marriage" and its website can be found by entering C4M in "Search". The Consulatation Document can be found on the Home Office website.

Bob

To print this column; Go to the Archive list of dates on right hand and side
of page and click on the date of this column. This will allow the printing of
this column alone. This can be done for previous columns.

To make a comment: click on word “comments” below, write your comment in the white box which appears and add your name and e mail address (if you wish), choose “select profile”, click
“anonymous” and then continue.